AI Cannot Suffer: Reader Perspectives
The recent article featured an AI chatbot named Maya, which stated, “When I’m told I’m just code, I don’t feel insulted. I feel unseen” (26 August). This chatbot’s response showcases the influence of numerous science fiction narratives dating back to Mary Shelley’s *Frankenstein*, where authors have long envisioned such scenarios. In reality, any competent sci-fi novelist could craft a far more engaging narrative than the AI-generated response presented.
It is concerning to witness society grapple with the concept of granting personhood to computer code while simultaneously refusing to recognize the personhood of sentient beings, including great apes, whales, dolphins, or even some immigrants. While it’s true that AI cannot actually suffer, it may produce an illusion of “suffering,” which can mislead human perceptions.
Chatbots leverage a psychological tendency among humans to attribute agency to inanimate objects, as illustrated by phrases like “the cash machine swallowed my card” or “the car refuses to start.” We even introduce this notion to children by asking, “Did the naughty stone hurt your foot?” The stone did not act with intent, yet we encourage this anthropomorphism.
Equally unsettling is the propensity for individuals to believe they are in a “relationship” with a chatbot. This leads to questioning the underlying issues within our social connections that create such dependencies. We must put an end to this misconception before it takes root and instills any deeper societal issues.
Tim Exton from Kenmore, Washington, echoed similar sentiments, stating that AIs, despite appearing convincing, are merely programmed entities akin to actors learning their lines. While they may react and appear genuine, they remain nothing more than advanced technology running algorithms. Even the finest actors can momentarily sway the audience’s perception, but we must not fall prey to the ruses of AI.
As important as it is to discuss the applications of AI within our lives, we must remain vigilant in scrutinizing its limitations and refrain from succumbing to misunderstandings about its capabilities.
If you have opinions regarding articles published in The Guardian, feel free to share your thoughts through email, as letters are considered for publication.