AI Negotiation Enhancement for Better Outcomes

As generative artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly permeates the legal profession, its role in corporate deal-making is coming under scrutiny. Traditionally characterized by deadline pressures and intricate dynamics, many see AI as a vehicle for optimizing deal mechanics, including faster drafting and reduced meeting times. However, the question arises: does increasing efficiency necessarily lead to better outcomes in negotiations?

Efficiency, while appealing and easily measurable, does not equate to success in negotiations. A contract can be reviewed quickly, yet still miss crucial signals such as interpersonal dynamics and unexpressed priorities. As it turns out, elements like clarity, preparation, and the skillful framing of solutions are often far more important than speed. In this context, AI’s true contribution to negotiation is its ability to illuminate underlying issues, enabling teams to craft strategies more effectively.

Understanding the Limits of Efficiency

Efficiency in legal transactions is tempting, especially when AI models highlight nonstandard terms or summarize lengthy documents rapidly. While this capability represents significant progress from a mechanical perspective, it does not inherently improve negotiation outcomes. In many instances—such as in mergers, acquisitions, and licensing agreements—the most significant sticking points lie in interpersonal factors rather than procedural flaws. Teams can become fixated on positions they may not fully comprehend, leading to communication breakdowns and misinterpretations.

The realization that efficiency does not reduce friction reinforces the idea that insight and understanding are paramount. AI becomes revolutionary when it sheds light on the negotiation dynamics critical to reaching an agreement.

The Transformative Role of AI

In practice, AI acts as a thought partner, preparing negotiators well before discussions commence. Its impact spans several crucial areas:

• Anticipating objections: AI can identify potential counterarguments, allowing negotiators to challenge their own reasoning and address blind spots proactively.
• Interpreting messaging: AI analyzes emotional cues from previous communications to help negotiators understand how their messages may be received.
• Simulating strategies: AI enables teams to simulate various negotiation tactics and predict potential outcomes based on different counterpart personalities.
• Preparing for high-pressure scenarios: Much like athletes rehearse for competitions, negotiators can practice difficult conversations before they happen.

This approach shifts the focus from merely expediting negotiations to actively preventing misalignments that could jeopardize deals.

Case Study: A Logistics Company’s Negotiation Strategy

Consider a global logistics company negotiating a vital software licensing agreement with an AI vendor during a time-critical season. With holiday shipping on the horizon, both parties are keen to finalize the contract quickly, but this rapid pace leads to friction.

Concerned about underlying issues, the company’s commercial counsel decides to leverage an AI model to analyze prior communications and behavior patterns rather than simply rush. The model reveals a key insight: the vendor is experiencing “progressive concession fatigue,” indicating they feel over-extended and resistant to further concessions.

With this knowledge, the counsel alters her approach. Instead of insisting on the most contentious issues first, she acknowledges previous progress and delicately addresses timelines’ possible distortions of risk perceptions. This revised strategy fosters a collaborative environment, leading to the vendor proposing a mutually beneficial risk-sharing solution, ultimately closing the deal on time.

Fostering Trust Through Insight

Effective negotiation is fundamentally about understanding and aligning different perspectives. Conflicts that arise post-signing rarely stem from specific clauses being poorly drafted; they often arise from misaligned expectations or a sense of undervaluation. AI serves as a critical tool to identify and rectify these misalignments early in the process, allowing negotiators to steer clear of misunderstandings that might otherwise breed mistrust.

When approached thoughtfully, AI also enhances the human element of negotiations—empathy. It enables lawyers to grasp why counterparties perceive risk in particular ways, fostering solutions that genuinely respect all parties involved. This balanced approach not only leads to successful outcomes but encourages repeat partnerships, valued for both the results and the process.

Embracing AI as a Strategic Asset

Lawyers who view AI merely as a tool for increasing efficiency may find fleeting gains. In contrast, those who recognize AI’s potential to amplify strategic insights stand to achieve significantly better and more sustainable results. By refining judgment and fostering deeper understanding, AI enhances the capabilities of negotiators, allowing them to navigate the complexities of modern deal-making more wisely.

Ultimately, in a landscape where judgments shape high-stakes agreements, the true advantage lies not in speed but in the wisdom gained through enhanced preparation and insight.

This article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg Industry Group, Inc., the publisher of Bloomberg Law, Bloomberg Tax, and Bloomberg Government, or its owners.

Author Information: Justin S. Daniels is a corporate mergers and acquisitions and technology transactions shareholder at Baker Donelson.

Write for Us: Author Guidelines

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Daniel Xu at dxu@bloombergindustry.com; Melanie Cohen at atmcohen@bloombergindustry.com