
Following the introduction of its AI-powered summarization feature, Apple faces significant backlash from the press freedom group Reporters Without Borders. The group is urging the tech giant to remove the function after a serious error involving a misleading summary of a BBC report.
The controversy erupted after a push notification from Apple inaccurately summarized the events surrounding the suspect in the killing of the chief executive of UnitedHealthcare. The notification erroneously reported that Luigi Mangione had shot himself, which was not the case. This prompted the BBC to reach out to Apple in hopes of rectifying the situation.
Vincent Berthier, head of technology and journalism at Reporters Without Borders, criticized Apple’s AI feature, stating, “A.I.s are probability machines, and facts can’t be decided by a roll of the dice.” He emphasized the gravity of producing false information under a media outlet’s banner, which poses risks to the public’s right to trustworthy news.
The incident reflects a growing concern within the journalism community regarding AI’s reliability in producing accurate information. Reporters Without Borders warned that the current capabilities of AI remain insufficient for generating credible news summaries, suggesting the technology is not ready for market applications in this field.
In response to the situation, the BBC reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring that all published information is reliable and trustworthy. Apple, however, has not yet addressed the growing concerns or provided a formal response to inquiries regarding the functionality of their AI tool.
This latest incident is a part of a broader struggle for news publishers as they navigate the evolving landscape introduced by generative AI technology. Since the launch of ChatGPT, several tech companies have deployed large language models, raising concerns among publishers about the use of copyrighted content. Some organizations, like The New York Times, have begun legal actions against the technology, while others like Axel Springer have sought licensing agreements.
As the dialogue around AI and media continues, the need for accountability and accuracy remains paramount for public trust in journalism.