The emergence of a new geopolitical reality has placed the US in the uncomfortable role of Europe’s adversary. This shift can be traced back to the Trump administration’s national security strategy, which has underscored a need for European nations to resist US influence to ensure their own survival. In this complex and tumultuous landscape, Europe holds significant leverage that could reshape the balance of power in the ongoing technological race, particularly in artificial intelligence (AI).

AI has burgeoned into a cornerstone of the US economy, rivaling consumer spending as a principal driver of growth. Currently, AI investments accounted for an overwhelming 92% of GDP growth in the first half of this year, with traditional growth figures revealing a mere 0.1% rise without this technological boon. As such, Donald Trump’s economic strategies seem increasingly precarious, especially given his inability to garner Senate support for an AI moratorium bill aimed at controlling state-level legislation on the matter. This tussle places further strain on his coalition, as fears surrounding AI’s potential to disrupt jobs gain traction among his voter base.

With this context, Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, could assert two critical influences that might compromise Trump’s AI-dependent economy. One of her primary levers is ASML, a Dutch company possessing a monopoly in manufacturing microchip-etching machines necessary for advanced AI production, particularly for companies like Nvidia — now among the world’s most valuable with a surging market value. The repercussions of restricting the export of such technology could spell disaster for the US economy, tying Trump’s fortunes closely to the fate of European policies.

Furthermore, Europe retains the capacity to enforce stringent data protection regulations against major US tech firms. Recent litigation has exposed vulnerabilities within companies like Google concerning their compliance with European data rules. Unlike the US, where corporate data usage often borders on the unchecked, Europe mandates rigorous accountability regarding personal data. By intensifying these regulations, Europe could effectively force American tech giants to either realign their data handling practices or risk losing access to the lucrative European market. This could destabilize the burgeoning AI models that currently thrive on massive data influxes, thus contributing to a potential burst of the AI bubble.

As Trump remains enmeshed in controversies around tech oversight, the stakes have never been higher for both him and his supporters—Maga voters are likely to grow disillusioned if their liberties are jeopardized under an administration increasingly seen as authoritarian. With the general elections approaching, European leaders must recognize their potential to constrain Trump’s influence decisively.

The resilience shown by leaders such as Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who has firmly opposed Trump’s manipulative tactics, showcases a model for resistance that European leaders might follow. The shifting political landscape necessitates that Europe stand firm, especially as the viability of Trump’s economic strategies comes under fire.

Ultimately, while Trump may dismiss Europe as weak, he significantly underestimates the strategic implications of Ursula von der Leyen’s potential enforcement of AI-related pressures. With decisive action, Europe could not only defend its democratic values but also reshape the contours of international economic competition in the era of AI.